Crypto Coins News - Ratings - Reviews
In case you were wondering whether Bitcoin Unlimited proponents were paid by Roger Ver to support his opinion, here is some primary source evidence. Note that a BUIP (Bitcoin Unlimited Improvement Proposal), unlike a BIP (Bitcoin Improvement Proposal), has in many instances become a request for funding from Roger Ver for all matter of things that are not protocol related. Here are some concrete examples:
BUIP-025 – Roger funded $1,000 (less balance of donations, amount undisclosed), to represent BU interests in Milan, Italy conference:
BUIP-027 – Roger funded at least $20,000 to advance his agenda in response to this proposal:
BUIP-035 – A request for $35,000 to revamp the bitcoin.com website. (status = "??")
BUIP-47 – A request for $40,000 to host a new conference and advance BU agendas. (status = "??")
Perhaps this pollution of BUIP is why the only one listed on their website is BUIP-001: https://www.bitcoinunlimited.info/buip
Please ask yourself: why would they hide the other BUIPs deep within their git repository instead of advertising them on their website (hint: many of them have nothing to do with improving the protocol or implementation.)
Richard Feynman warned against any organization that served primarily to bestow the honor of membership upon others. [https://youtu.be/Dkv0KCR3Yiw?t=149] The following BUIP's do nothing but elect those honors: BUIP-3, BUIP-7, BUIP-8, BUIP-11, BUIP-12, BUIP-19, BUIP-28, BUIP-29, BUIP-31, BUIP-32, BUIP-36, BUIP-42, BUIP-58.
Please, by all means, peruse the Bitcoin Unlimited "Improvement" Proposals here: https://github.com/BitcoinUnlimited/BUIP/ , and review them in character and substance to the BIP's here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki
It's unfair to judge an opinion by the shills that support it, but it is absolutely fair to judge an organization by it's willingness to fund shills.
PS – This is NOT a throwaway account. This account spans most of Bitcoin's existence.