If Segwit needs 95{88c91daedd271a990a10650c05d769cae2765e0603edf30ca95f18704e5748e8} signalling to be “safe”, why wasn’t it implemented as a Hardfork with 95{88c91daedd271a990a10650c05d769cae2765e0603edf30ca95f18704e5748e8} signalling?

Ticker

1 BTC = $40059.01 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 ETH = $2568.35 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 LTC = $175.83 USD  (via Coinbase)
Quotes delayed up to 2 minutes.

Kryptous

Crypto Coins News - Ratings - Reviews

1 News - 247 News - 247 Bitcoin - 1 Search

BTC - BCH - ETH - LITE - XRP

Buy Sell Trade Crypto Here

 

As a sideline watcher for 2+ years, this is what I shake my head at everyday.

A 95{88c91daedd271a990a10650c05d769cae2765e0603edf30ca95f18704e5748e8} signalling Hardfork Segwit + 2Mb blocks would have easily gotten 95{88c91daedd271a990a10650c05d769cae2765e0603edf30ca95f18704e5748e8} of the community behind it. Such a simple compromise. Tragic that it didn't happen.

But, my question is still serious. With 95{88c91daedd271a990a10650c05d769cae2765e0603edf30ca95f18704e5748e8} needed, why not implement a cleaner hardfork?

submitted by /u/groovymash
[link] [comments]

Kryptous

Crypto Coins News - Ratings - Reviews

1 News - 247 News - 247 Bitcoin - 1 Search

BTC - BCH - ETH - LITE - XRP

Buy Sell Trade Crypto Here

 

Ticker

1 BTC = $40059.01 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 ETH = $2568.35 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 LTC = $175.83 USD  (via Coinbase)
Quotes delayed up to 2 minutes.

Leave a Reply